When dealing with issues of a dark nature, sometimes earthly expressions are needed. To understand such occurrences or realities outside of this understood plane, many times the mirroring that occurs within earth is there for a reason. There are no accidents about it as earth is a training grounds of a nature not realized or understood by many. This is by design. For learning to occur, one must have no prior recollection of having said knowledge or experience.
On earth today, there are human beings who grow up in conditions or are forced to acclimate themselves to understandings that to them seem the norm. Many discover at some point that their understanding of “normal” is but something taught. “That is normal.” Others say, “That is not normal.” How is one to know what is normal?
To answer that question, one must be exposed to a broad range of perspectives to see the variety of which normality can be defined. Without figure heads along the entire spectrum, no one will be able to understand the paradox of referencing themselves to a certain point of normality along that spectrum. What is normal to one is seen as not normal to another. It is all subjective.
For instance, pain is a subjective understanding, as is feeling “good.” Feeling either can be understood subjectively as normal or not. To enjoy pain, or no pain, such as bliss, either can be subjectively understood as goodness. Good, it’s base meaning, can have limitless definitions across a spectrum from light to dark. What is good to the dark is not what is understood as good to light.
Just as man may devote his life to body suspension via hooks and chains, performing displays of feats beyond normal to many, he is exercising his choice in the good that he understands in pain. Likewise, an athlete may undertake an ultramarathon, putting his metabolism and very organs on the edge of destruction, enjoying the good pain that he or she may understand within that choice of effort. In either case, there is an understanding of what is involved in either choice. Free will choice is involved.
Now, take a child and raise it within slavery and sexual prostitution and teach it as normal. Take a citizenship and limit learning for the purpose of mass control under fear. Free will is taken away and taught as normal. Is that good to perform those efforts against an individual or a group? Would that be understood as crossing a line? Who would determine such lines? How would such lines and ultimate boundaries of free will violations be determined? How would such boundaries be understood, the consequences and ultimate damage produced on a consciousness of any form?
Sock puppets. When you take a sock, put your hand in it, and make it talk and do what you want it to do, this is a basic example of how free will violations occur within earthly existence and beyond. There is a multiverse of unimaginable infinity beyond our earth lives we understand. But free will and manipulation can be understood in the above simple image. In fact, the term “sock puppets,” it’s meaning outside of earthly existence, is a quite serious matter.
Zoltan Blue 