So many of us have asked the question “Is that correct or incorrect?” The answer is yes. All is correct. For all that enters the consciousness of humanity is valid. Some may say “Well, I just can’t believe that!” You are correct, and you’re incorrect. You can and you can’t. No matter what thought it is, or feeling, it is most definitely valid. How can this be so?
Take, for instance, one woman who thinks she is ugly, but is obviously very attractive in a multitude of ways to others. The reality is that she is both ugly and attractive. It depends upon which conscious unit is in question. Thus both are valid, she is ugly, and she is attractive. For today, a woman who thinks she is attractive, may have at one time thought she was ugly.
How about flight? Is that real today? Is it correct? Yes. Was it any less correct when kite flying was invented? No, it is not. For thousands of years, the idea of flight has been within human consciousness. So, if a kite could fly centuries ago, constructed by humanity, why is “flight” any less valid across a space of time? How long has a bird been in existence?
Today, we are experiencing a multitude of communication across the entire planet in the expression of consciousness. Make a list yourself. What has entered the consciousness of humanity? If simple ideas like “ugly, attractive, and flight” can show an evolution of validity, why is it that all that resides within consciousness cannot be valid? The answer is simple. Even what one is conscious of, validity can be believed or not. Even what one is not conscious of, validity can be believed or not.
So, belief, is it valid? Sure. “I believe.” “I do not believe.” Both are valid. Now, is simulation theory or artificial intelligence valid? Yes and no. Both are correct. It depends upon the consciousness unit in question, the individual human being. Yet each human being has thought and feeling that enters their consciousness and forms their “Yes” or “No” answer. Is either wrong? No. Both are correct. Yet, both are incorrect as well.
For you see, what we do not know about ourselves, this planet, life upon it, our solar system, and beyond, is merely as far away as our consciousness. So many look to the outer world for answers. They look to create that which so many see within their own conscious fields. They look for validation of the is, and the is not. Could it be as simple as if it is within consciousness, it just is? And, if that is true, how can that be possible? To see and to know something that does not exist within this world, or have a plausible answer for, does that mean that it is not valid? No, and Yes. Belief, or non-belief.
Is an artist any less valid for their creations? Is a scientist any less valid for their theories? Is a philosopher any less valid for their postulations? Is an every day Joe or Jane any less valid for anything that resides within their consciousness? No they are not. And, yes they are. For if there is validity and non-validity, belief and non-belief, there can only be one answer. All is valid. When pondering that, a door opens, and truth can be seen.
For we all are here and then we are gone. We witness and dream. We theorize and postulate. As history has shown it, the dreams, theories, and postulates of antiquity surround us today. When we each leave, will all our dreams, theories, and postulates unrealized here on Earth forever be vanished to us? Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream. Does our boat stop rowing? To what waters does this stream of life bring us to? Could it be our dreams? Whether we believe all is valid or not, surely a dream can show us in our own mind’s eye that what we do not see here currently, is but a thought and a feeling away. How close is that? Closer than we think.
Zoltan Blue 